Peppies Peppies tortoise mark

Where things stand

The peptide review, step by step

The path from "an FDA advisory committee is looking at peptides" to "you can legally get one at a pharmacy" is longer and more specific than most coverage suggests. Here is exactly where things are - and where the decision that actually matters still lies ahead.

September 2023
The FDA flags a group of peptides as "Category 2"

The FDA places a group of peptides - including BPC-157 - in "Category 2" of its interim review for pharmacy compounding under section 503A, citing significant safety concerns. In plain terms: they cannot be legally compounded. Demand, however, does not disappear.

Source: FDA 503A bulk-substances categories →
April 2026
A reshaped FDA reclassifies 12 peptides and sends them to an advisory committee

Under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the FDA removes a set of peptides from Category 2 and refers them to its Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee for a formal review. Important: removal from Category 2 is not approval - it moves them into the review process.

Source: FiercePharma, 2026 →
July 9, 2026
Deadline for public comments to reach the committee

Comments filed to docket FDA-2025-N-6895 on or before this date are provided directly to the committee ahead of the meeting. Peppies filed its comment - urging that the safety cost of the unregulated status quo be weighed, and that any access come with rigorous testing standards.

Source: FDA docket FDA-2025-N-6895 →
Now - mid-July 2026 You are here
The docket is open; the meeting is days away

The public docket remains open through July 22, 2026. Late comments are still considered by the FDA but may not reach committee members before they vote.

Source: FDA docket (open through July 22) →
July 23-24, 2026
The advisory committee meets and votes

The Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee meets at the FDA's White Oak campus to review seven peptides - BPC-157, KPV, TB-500 and MOTS-c on day one; DSIP/Emideltide, Semax and Epitalon on day two - and vote recommendations. These votes are advisory and non-binding. Meet the panel →

Source: FDA meeting notice →
After the meeting
The FDA decides whether to act

The FDA weighs the committee's recommendation - which it usually follows but is not required to. Notably, the agency's own career scientists have recommended against adding these peptides, citing insufficient safety data. The committee's advice and the staff review may not align.

Source: FDA briefing materials →
The decision that carries legal weight
Formal rulemaking - and the comment window that counts

Actually changing access requires the FDA to open formal rulemaking: a proposed rule, a public comment period, and a final rule - a process that can take more than a year. That later comment window is the one where an ordinary person's comment carries legal weight. Most people never hear it opened. We'll tell you the moment it does.

Source: how the 503A list is set (FDA) →
Sources. Drawn from the FDA's official meeting notice and briefing documents (docket FDA-2025-N-6895), the FDA's Category 2 guidance, and public reporting. Peppies is independent and not affiliated with the FDA. This page is updated as the picture changes.